commentary by Patrick H. Moore
Last November, the media was awash with stories about an idealistic young girl known only as Star whose idealism had somehow become fixated on the old Murder Manager himself, Charles Manson, to such a degree that she had decided that she and Manson were going to be married. In a post we ran on All Things Crime Blog, we wrote:
It’s now reported that Manson not only has a young female admirer but that she is determined that he and she will “walk down the aisle together” or however marriages are handled in the notorious California State Prison system. Her name is Star and she is a 25-year-old brunette who’s been loyally visiting Manson in jail since she was 19 years old. She maintains several websites devoted to defending her man and his pro-Earth environmental causes. Star told Rolling Stone that she became enchanted with Manson’s environmental stance, which he calls ATWA — air, trees, water, air — when she was only 19.
As for Star herself, she stated:
“I’ll tell you straight up, Charlie and I are going to get married. When that will be, we don’t know. But I take it very seriously. Charlie is my husband. Charlie told me to tell you this. We haven’t told anybody about that.”
Manson, however, in his typically cynical fashion, refused to corroborate Star’s impassioned statement. “Oh that,” he says. “That’s a bunch of garbage. You know that, man. That’s trash. We’re just playing that for public consumption.”
On another occasion he told Rolling Stone: “Star! She’s not a woman. She’s a star in the Milky Way!”
Now, however, almost one year later, it appears that Star’s glorious dream of marrying Manson may soon come true after all. Linda Deutsch and Scott Smith write for AP:
Mass murderer Charles Manson has gotten a license to marry a 26-year-old woman who visits him in prison.
The marriage license obtained Monday by The Associated Press was issued Nov. 7 for the 80-year-old Manson and Afton Elaine Burton, who left her Midwestern home nine years ago and moved to Corcoran, California — the site of the prison — to be near Manson. She maintains several websites advocating for Manson’s innocence.
Deutsch and Smith state that the license does not have a specific wedding date and that the December-May couple must be lawfully wed within a 90 day window, or else they will need to reapply.
“Y’all can know that it’s true,” she said. “It’s going to happen.”
“I love him,” she added. “I’m with him. There’s all kinds of things.”
When asked about Manson’s obnoxious and rather deprecating “trash” and “public consumption” comments, Star was unphased:
“None of that’s true.” She then added that she and Charlie are waiting for the prison to process their paperwork.
When approached by the AP, Terry Thornton, a California Department of Corrections spokeswoman, confirmed that the prison had received the license.
Thornton explained that each California state prison designates an employee to be a marriage coordinator. Said official processes the paperwork which is generally approved because the CDC (California Department of Corrections) considers such weddings to serve as “a tool of family reunification and social development.”
Admittedly, though, Manson’s case is somewhat unique. In a moment of candor, Star explained that the wedding might have happened sooner “if Manson did not have “some situations” at the prison.
Specifically, according to Spokeswomen Thornton the “situations” include three violations of prison rules on Manson’s part, which suggests that Star’s betrothed is still marginally incorrigible, although at this late date, he probably doesn’t really pose much of a threat to anyone. But you be the judge. The violations which date back to February are:
1) possession of a weapon
2) threatening staff
3) refusal to provide a urine sample.
Star is confident that she and Charlie’s nuptials will go forward as planned. Prison marriages occur on the first Saturday of each month and she expects the ceremony will be held in an inmate visiting room.
According to prison rules, Star and Charlie can ask someone from the free world to preside over the ceremony and they are allowed to invite up to 10 non-inmate guests.
Once they are lawfully wed, the couple will not be allowed to engage in conjugal (family) visits because Manson is serving life and has never succeeded in convincing the parole board to give him a parole date
This does not appear to bother Star, though, who intends to work on his case and help him eventually obtain release. As Manson’s wife, she will have the legal right to obtain information not available to non-relatives.
“There’s certain things next of kin can do,” said Star who maintains that Manson is innocent and will ultimately be granted a new trial. As things stand presently, Manson will not be eligible for parole until 2027.
Manson has been incarcerated since 1969. He was convicted of master-minding “the gruesome killings of actress Sharon Tate and four others at her estate on Aug. 9, 1969, and grocers Leno and Rosemary LaBianca who were killed the following night.”
Unlike Manson, who will probably never be (or seem) completely redeemed, most of his imprisoned followers became model prisoners. Yet, they allowed themselves to be led terribly astray by Manson and his peculiar charm which led to the murders and their imprisonment in the first place. Thus, Star is simply the latest young woman to be swept off her feet by Charlie. The old boy, alas, still has the knack.
Fortunately, it seems quite unlikely that he will try to manipulate Star into killing someone on his behalf. But, of course, you never know for sure.
Click here to view out earlier Charles Manson posts:
SITES WE LIKE
True Crime Historian
Peter Prasad's Goodreads Blog
Hard Case Crime
True Crime Report
3: AM Magazine
The Weekly Lizard
The Young Turks
The Glasgow Curse
John Nardizzi, Author
Thomas Davidson, Author
Mike Roche, Author
Darcia Helle, Author
Darcia Helle, Author's Blog
The Trouble with Justice
Ann Marie Ackermann's Author Website
RJ Parker True Crime Website
Serial Killer Calendar.com
- “Suicides don’t take two shots.” – The Death of Michelle O’Connell on
- Do Helena Stoeckley’s Ramblings Convey Reasonable Doubt for Jeffrey MacDonald? on
- When Santa Cruz Was “The Murder Capital of the World,” Part One on
- The “Smiley Face Killer” Theory Refuses to Die on
- Murder Stories I Can Never Forget: Snake River Serial Killer Still at Large? on
- January 2017
- October 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013